CREWAI - AGENTS WRITING EMAILS - Optimizing CrewAI : 1 Crew Vs 3 Crews
AI Summary
Summary: Optimizing Crew AI for Email Template Generation
Background:
- The goal was to create email templates for prospecting CMOS using a solution for generating ads programmatically.
- The solution targets direct-to-consumer brands and agencies with high Facebook ad spend.
- Qi AI, a new framework for orchestrating AI agents, was tested for this purpose.
- Qi AI is compared to competitors like Autogen and Dev Jet.
Process:
- The author experimented with Qi AI and received advice from the founder on breaking down tasks.
- The Qi Discord channel was recommended for its active community and responsive founder.
Experiment:
- Two approaches were tested: using three separate crews (CS) for different tasks versus one crew with delegation abilities (CP).
- The tasks involved writing, revising, and critiquing email templates.
First Approach (Three Crews):
- Crew 1: Write the email.
- Crew 2: Revise the email.
- Crew 3: Review and rewrite the email.
- Each crew had specific roles, goals, and abilities.
Second Approach (One Crew with Delegation):
- One crew with multiple roles and one detailed task.
- The direct-to-consumer CMO had delegation abilities to assign tasks to other agents.
Results:
- The first approach resulted in three separate outputs that did not seem to build on each other effectively.
- The second approach with delegation appeared more flexible and logical, with agents learning from feedback and adjusting accordingly.
Conclusion:
- The author prefers the second approach with one crew and delegation abilities.
- A future video will compare Qi AI with Autogen.
- Feedback on the video content and format is requested.
Call to Action:
- Viewers are encouraged to like, subscribe, and comment with their thoughts and preferences for future content.